| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
23/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DEVINCENZI, T.; JAURENA, M.; DURANTE, M.; SAVIAN, J.V.; CIAPPESONI, G.; NAVAJAS, E.; CIGANDA, V.; LATTANZI, F.; PARUELO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
THAIS DEVINCENZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTÍN DURANTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Concepción Del Uruguay, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS GABRIEL CIAPPESONI SCARONE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELLY ANA NAVAJAS VALENTINI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Building the GLENCOE Platform -Grasslands LENding eConomic and ecOsystems sErvices. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, June 2021, volume 516, Article 547301. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301 |
|
ISSN : |
2571-581X |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 31 March 2020, Accepted 26 April 2021, Published 16 June 2021.
Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Karl Behrendt, Harper Adams University, United Kingdom; Kamaljit Kaur Sangha, Charles Darwin University, Australia.
This article is part of the research topic: Grazing in Future Multi-scapes: From Thought scapes to Landscapes, Creating Health from the Ground Up (Url: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/11179/grazing-in-future-multi-scapes-from-thoughtscapes-to-landscapes-creating-health-from-the-ground-up#articles)
Correspondence: Devincenzi, T.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Programa Producción de Carne y Lana, Estación Experimental INIA Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email: tdevincenzi@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories on productive and environmental traits. The platform is composed of three independent farmlets of 50 ha each, where multiparous Hereford cows and Merinos wethers co-graze under three grazing management systems. Each farmlet is managed according to different spatio-temporal decisions of the specific management of vegetation communities, grazing methods, and the stockpile of forage that is allowed by the number of the existing paddocks. Farmlet-1; comprises less decisions (2 paddocks), Farmlet-2; intermediate (8 paddocks), and Farmlet-3; high level of decisions (32 paddocks). This innovative platform will be used as a participatory and interdisciplinary space for research and co-learning of management on processes that can only be observed in long-term evaluations, and at farmlet scale. We expect that this new approach will contribute to the developement and implemention of sustainable grazing management systems in Uruguay.
© Copyright © 2021 Devincenzi, Jaurena, Durante, Savian, Ciappesoni, Navajas, Ciganda, Lattanzi and Paruelo. MenosABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Beef-cattle; Campos grasslands; Mixed-grazing; Rangelands; Sustainable intensification. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16658/1/fsufs-05-547301.pdf
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04320naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1062321
005 2022-09-02
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2571-581X
024 7 $a10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301$2DOI
100 1 $aDEVINCENZI, T.
245 $aBuilding the GLENCOE Platform -Grasslands LENding eConomic and ecOsystems sErvices.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 31 March 2020, Accepted 26 April 2021, Published 16 June 2021. Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Karl Behrendt, Harper Adams University, United Kingdom; Kamaljit Kaur Sangha, Charles Darwin University, Australia. This article is part of the research topic: Grazing in Future Multi-scapes: From Thought scapes to Landscapes, Creating Health from the Ground Up (Url: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/11179/grazing-in-future-multi-scapes-from-thoughtscapes-to-landscapes-creating-health-from-the-ground-up#articles) Correspondence: Devincenzi, T.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Programa Producción de Carne y Lana, Estación Experimental INIA Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email: tdevincenzi@inia.org.uy
520 $aABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories on productive and environmental traits. The platform is composed of three independent farmlets of 50 ha each, where multiparous Hereford cows and Merinos wethers co-graze under three grazing management systems. Each farmlet is managed according to different spatio-temporal decisions of the specific management of vegetation communities, grazing methods, and the stockpile of forage that is allowed by the number of the existing paddocks. Farmlet-1; comprises less decisions (2 paddocks), Farmlet-2; intermediate (8 paddocks), and Farmlet-3; high level of decisions (32 paddocks). This innovative platform will be used as a participatory and interdisciplinary space for research and co-learning of management on processes that can only be observed in long-term evaluations, and at farmlet scale. We expect that this new approach will contribute to the developement and implemention of sustainable grazing management systems in Uruguay. © Copyright © 2021 Devincenzi, Jaurena, Durante, Savian, Ciappesoni, Navajas, Ciganda, Lattanzi and Paruelo.
653 $aBeef-cattle
653 $aCampos grasslands
653 $aMixed-grazing
653 $aRangelands
653 $aSustainable intensification
700 1 $aJAURENA, M.
700 1 $aDURANTE, M.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aCIAPPESONI, G.
700 1 $aNAVAJAS, E.
700 1 $aCIGANDA, V.
700 1 $aLATTANZI, F.
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, June 2021, volume 516, Article 547301. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
10/08/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/05/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
|
Autor : |
ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; BORTAGARAY, I.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBIN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Applying the Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis (PIPA) approach to enhance co-innovation for sustainability within livestock family farming in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016. |
|
Páginas : |
17 p. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important
when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused on a participatory evaluation of the whole project, demonstrating that a successful innovation process took place. This Uruguayan case showed that within the coinnovation framework, the PIPA approach nurtured the creation of a common space for social learning and innovation, providing a useful instrument for rural development. MenosABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important
when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused o... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EVALUATION; LEARNING PROCESS; METHODS; MONITORING; NETWORKS; PLANNING. |
|
Thesagro : |
INVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA; PRODUCCION FAMILIAR. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8203/1/1.2-Albicette-2016-IFSA-Conference-paper.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02902nam a2200313 a 4500
001 1055218
005 2018-05-28
008 2016 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
245 $aApplying the Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis (PIPA) approach to enhance co-innovation for sustainability within livestock family farming in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016.$c2016
300 $a17 p.
520 $aABSTRACT. Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused on a participatory evaluation of the whole project, demonstrating that a successful innovation process took place. This Uruguayan case showed that within the coinnovation framework, the PIPA approach nurtured the creation of a common space for social learning and innovation, providing a useful instrument for rural development.
650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA
650 $aPRODUCCION FAMILIAR
653 $aEVALUATION
653 $aLEARNING PROCESS
653 $aMETHODS
653 $aMONITORING
653 $aNETWORKS
653 $aPLANNING
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
700 1 $aALBIN, A.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
